NYCDEP Requesting Comments On Proposed Changes to Asbestos Regulations

Asbestos Rat in New York City

New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) is requesting comments regarding the amendments to Title 15 (the asbestos regulations).  These comments are due before December 6, 2010.  The link on the title will provide you the location of the amendments and to make comments on the amendments.   A public hearing will be held on December 6, 2010 at the NYCDEP, 59-17 Junction Boulevard, 6th Floor, Flushing, NY 11373, from 10:00 A.M. to 12 Noon.  Persons who have questions about the hearing should contact Belinda Pantina at (718) 595-6555.  Primary changes are made to the definition to clarify materials, the section on Alterations/Renovations/Modifications to include asbestos exemptions, the section on Asbestos Abatement Permits to detail what is included in a work place safety plan, section on Abatement from Vertical Exterior Surfaces was modified to provide guidance when abatement should not be performed, and to correct typographical errors and other small corrections.   An example of the changes includes the following:

•  Asbestos Assessment Report. If the building (or portions thereof) affected by the work are free of asbestos-containing material or the amount of ACM to be abated constitutes a minor project, an asbestos assessment report (Form ACP-5) completed, signed, and sealed by a DEP-certified asbestos investigator, along with a fee of $[25]47.00 shall be submitted to [DOB] DEP prior to construction document approval and to any amendment of the construction document approval which increases the scope of the project to include (a) work area(s) not previously covered.

Note that the fee is now $47 for the asbestos assessment report and the form must be submitted to the DEP not the Building Department.  This is an example of the changes in the document those things underline are new and those bracketted are deleted.  Remember afte rreading it if you want to make comments you have till December 6, 2010 to make those comments.

Related articles

• NYC DEP Plans Increase In Enforcement On Asbestos Investigators (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Knicks game postponed by asbestos to be played in March (cbc.ca)
• Sabotage fear over asbestos in sandpits (news.theage.com.au)
• Audits Planned for Asbestos Inspections (green.blogs.nytimes.com)

Importance of Respiratory Protection at Demolition or Disaster Sites

The Newsday story "Ground Zero settlement tally delayed as deadline hits" had the above image as part of the story.  Based on this image we see workers at the sight wearing two different types of respirators and one worker wearing only a neckerchief (or something similar).  The predominant respirator worn in this picture is the filtering facepiece respirator.  This respirator is primarily meant to handle nuisance dusts and is not intended in handling hazardous materials or chemical vapors.  It has two straps and most have a metal nose clip that is meant to achieve a better seal around the nose.  It seems most are wearing these correctly except the individual in the background which appears to have only one strap on.  For this individual, the respirator is probably not providing the intended protection.  Three individuals have the half-mask air purifying respirators two are wearing them properly while the third is wearing it as jewelry.  The cartridges being worn are high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters.  The HEPA filter is the highest level filter you can get for particulates and will filter out asbestos, lead, and other hazardous dusts.  However, this filter will not filter chemical vapors.  Based on the contaminants previously published from 9/11, the standard respirator should have been a half-mask air purifying respirator with organic vapor, acid gas, and P100 (HEPA) filters.  So all the respirators in the picture were the wrong type to protect them, based on published reports of the contaminants at the 9/11 work sight.  Hopefully, the regulatory and disaster community learned the lessons of 9/11 and in the future we can ensure workers at the sight wear the proper respirator and wear it properly.  Maybe then in the future we will not have to pay these claims on people who got sick for not wearing a respirator or wearing the wrong type.

Related articles

• Maloney Pushes for Enforcement of BP Recovery Worker Respirator Guidelines (workinprogress.firedoglake.com)
• Dealing with Hazardous Substances on the Construction Site (constructionlawva.com)
• As wildfires spread, Colorado residents seek relief from smoke (blogs.consumerreports.org)
• "(VIDEO OF DEMO) Tower from Ohio Edison Mad River Power Plants falls wrong way after mistake in Demolition Fail" and related posts (leftcoastrebel.com)
• Trouble? Not If You've Got the Emergency Bra (foxnews.com)
• MSHA issues proposed rule on lowering miners' exposure to respirable coal dust (prnewswire.com)

5 Easy Ways to Improve Indoor Air Quality - My Money (usnews.com)

Image by kqedquest via FlickrThe garage as far as we are concerned is one of the most dangerous areas of the home.  Between the car, tool, and chemical storage it can have various items that by themselves would have significant impacts on indoor air quality.  Individually, cars can impact air quality with the carbon monoxide they produce that can infiltrate the home, tools, depending on what powers them, can also have the same effect as a car or can generate contaminants like sawdust, silica, asbestos or other hazardous vapors, and chemical storage by itself can generate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other hazardous vapors and mists.   The above article points out various ways you can improve your air quality and the ideas are excellent.

Related articles

• 5 Easy Ways to Improve Indoor Air Quality (money.usnews.com)
• Floorings Affect on Indoor Air Quality (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• ReCircle: Heating Costs, Lighting Laws, Indoor Air Quality Improvements, Kansas, and more! (energycircle.com)
• Terri's Top 5 Sources Of Indoor Air Pollution (doyourpart.com)
• Best Way to Improve Indoor Air Quality (planetsave.com)

Kings Park Psychiatric Center Cleanup Estimated At $215 Million

Image via WikipediaThe verdict is in on the Kings Park Psychiatric Center environmental cleanup.  The cleanup is estimated to cost $215 million.  Compared to original estimates from developers ten years ago of $60 million, that is nearly 4 times the original estimates.  Though we don't think the original estimates were accurate at all.  The current estimate, developed by Dvirka and Bartilucci an environmental engineering firm based in Woodbury, NY, and TRC Environmental, an environmental consultanting firm based in NYC, is probably closest to the mark because Dvirka and Bartilucci and TRC spent several months on the property performing a number of inspections and surveys to get as accurate a picture of the materials and the costs involved with this project. 
The $215 million price is for demolishing all 57 abandoned buildings on the property and returning the 368 acres to open space, said a statement from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, which commissioned the study by Dvirka & Bartilucci.  The bulk of the cost, about $186 million, pays for tearing down the buildings and cleaning up asbestos and other hazardous materials. Other costs include $26 million to demolish and remediate five miles of underground steam tunnels and $3.7 million to excavate materials dumped on the property over the years.  State Sen. John Flanagan (R-East Northport) had secured $29 million for park cleanup and agreed to spend $3.6 million for the environmental study.  He said the actual cost will be determined when the projects are put out for bid. 
In February 2009, after community groups clamored for some resolution of the property, then State Parks Commissioner Carol Ash ordered the demolition of 15 buildings deemed unsafe, which will cost $14 million. Requests for bids for that project will go out soon.  Once that happens and those bids come in we will get a better idea what it will actually cost.

Related articles

• TRC Exit Strategy Program Facilitates Cleanup and Closure of Two Midwestern Landfills (eon.businesswire.com)
• 'Old GM' to reportedly set aside $773M for environmental cleanup plan (autoblog.com)
• G.M. Estate to Provide Millions for Cleanup of Old Sites (nytimes.com)
• 25 Bone-Chilling Photos of Abandoned Places (mymodernmet.com)
• New dioxin rules might force more cleanups (sfgate.com)

Gov. Paterson Proposes Eliminating New York Participation in Federal Superfund Program

Image via WikipediaIt seems to us that our lame duck Governor is doing all the nasty and dirty work before the incoming Governor has to.  Between laying off state workers, firing the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC), and now eliminating New York State's participation in Superfund, its to bad we can't get a tax cap in place, too.  It concerns us how NYS DEC will be able to handle all the work that is scheduled for NYS.  Between the Hudson River Dredging project, the Gowanus Canal and Newtown Creek just to mention a few.  We need to make sure that Governor Patterson's obvious attack on the NYS DEC does not hamper or significantly hinder its ability to perform its functions in New York State.

Related articles

• Green Party New York: Guv cand Hawkins Challenges Cuomo to Oppose Paterson's Efforts to Leave Superfund (wilderside.wordpress.com)
• Timesunion.com: Layoffs loom at agency in transition (timesunion.com)
• Ending Superfund role is foolish (timesunion.com)
• Government lacks basic manpower (timesunion.com)
• Anger over state pullout (timesunion.com)
• Gov. ready to swing the ax on nearly 900 state jobs (nydailynews.com)
• Green: Paterson Fires Environmental Commissioner (green.blogs.nytimes.com)
• Governor's Aide Steps In for Ousted Environment Chief (green.blogs.nytimes.com)
• Newtown Creek Is Declared a Superfund Site (nytimes.com)
• "Another Superfund Site in New York City: Newtown Creek to Get a Makeover" and related posts (blogs.ei.columbia.edu)