Regulatory Updates, Industry Concerns, and Straight Talk from OSHA and NYSDOL at the PACNY 29th Annual Environmental Conference – Day 3

The third and final day of the Professional Abatement Contractors of New York (PACNY) 29th Annual Environmental Conference at the beautiful Turning Stone Resort Casino wrapped up another outstanding year of education, discussion, and industry networking. February 27, 2026, focused heavily on regulatory updates, owner expectations, compliance trends, and direct engagement with regulators — exactly the kind of practical information environmental professionals need to bring back to the field.

The Mohawk Room

Throughout the day, attendees gathered in the Mohawk Room for presentations.  At the same time, the Oneida Room Vendor Exhibit Hall continued to serve as the hub for coffee breaks, networking, and conversations with exhibitors.  PACNY once again demonstrated why this conference remains one of the most valuable environmental industry events in New York State.

PACNY Leadership Opens the Day

The morning began with remarks from PACNY President Kevin Hutton and PACNY Vice President Russell Vent, who discussed the current state of PACNY, ongoing industry initiatives, and the organization’s continued role in supporting environmental professionals throughout New York State. Their comments reflected both the growth of the organization and the evolving challenges facing the asbestos, remediation, and environmental consulting industries.

"A Crystal Ball” Panel Brings Owner Perspectives Front and Center

One of the most engaging discussions of the day was the panel presentation titled:

“A Crystal Ball – What Owners and General Managers Want You To Know”

The session was moderated by Bridget Ruane of C&S Companies and featured panelists representing multiple perspectives within the construction and environmental industry:

• James Riscica of C&S Technical Services, representing general contractors
• Sean Dollaway of C&S Companies, representing construction managers
• Conor Osterman of SUNY Upstate Medical University, representing owners and clients

This panel generated substantial discussion because it addressed a growing frustration that many owners, construction managers, and contractors are experiencing regarding asbestos surveys and project design documents.

Bridget Ruane moderating "Crystal Ball" panel

Several recurring themes emerged:

• Lack of sufficient detail in asbestos surveys
• Overreliance on asbestos presumptions in specifications and designs
• Disconnects between field conditions and design assumptions
• Challenges owners face when incomplete information results in costly change orders or project delays
• Difficulties contractors encounter when survey limitations are not clearly communicated upfront

The panelists emphasized that owners and construction managers are increasingly expecting consultants and designers to provide clearer documentation, more defensible assumptions, and practical project planning. It was an honest conversation that many attendees clearly related to based on the audience participation and follow-up discussions afterward.

OSHA Provides Regulatory and Enforcement Updates

Following a coffee break in the exhibit hall, Jeff Presbin from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) presented updates regarding OSHA standards and enforcement trends

The presentation focused heavily on:

• OSHA’s Top Ten Violations from 2025
• Enforcement trends involving asbestos work
• Common compliance failures seen during inspections
• Regulatory expectations for documentation and worker protection

For environmental contractors and consultants, these discussions are always valuable because they provide insight into where OSHA is placing emphasis during inspections and enforcement actions.

Jeff Presbin from OSHA

Asbestos compliance continues to remain a significant area of concern, particularly involving respiratory protection, regulated areas, exposure assessments, competent person oversight, and proper work practices under the asbestos construction standard.

NYSDOL Roundtable Closes Out the Conference

The final presentation of the conference featured representatives from the New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) Asbestos Control Bureau:

• Vincent Rapacciuolo, Deputy Director of Safety & Health
• Chek Beng Ng, Professional Engineer 2
• Jason Pensabene, Program Manager 2

As always, the NYSDOL session drew substantial attendance and participation because attendees had the opportunity to directly engage with regulators and ask real-world compliance questions.

Chek Beng Ng, Jason Pensabene, & Vincent Rapacciuolo, NYSDOL

Expansion of the MPWR System

Vincent Rapacciuolo discussed the proposed expansion of the MPWR website platform, including increased electronic functionality involving:

• Notifications
• Payment of fines
• Opt-in electronic communications
• Asbestos license renewals

The overall direction is clear — NYSDOL continues moving toward expanded electronic communications and digital administration processes.  For contractors, consultants, and building owners, staying current with these electronic systems will become increasingly important.

Variance Statistics and Processing Times

Chek Beng Ng provided updates regarding variance activity processed by the NYSDOL Engineering Services Unit (ESU) over the past year. The numbers were eye-opening:

• 1,759 total variances processed
• 120 statewide variances
• 121 school variances
• 380 emergency variances
• 1,130 site-specific variances

Average processing time was reported at approximately two weeks. These statistics highlight both the volume of asbestos-related work occurring throughout NYS and the continued importance of understanding the variance process under Industrial Code Rule 56.

New NYSDOL Fact Sheets

Jason Pensabene discussed several newly released NYSDOL fact sheets concerning asbestos survey requirements in NYS, with another guidance document currently in development.  The fact sheets are all asbestos survey-related:

• Asbestos Survey Always Required - (Published based on a PACNY initiative)
• NYS Asbestos Survey Requirements - Municipalities
• NYS Asbestos Survey Requirements - Building Permit Applicants
• Expectations for Contents of Asbestos Surveys and Assessments (published after the conference in March)

These fact sheets are expected to provide additional clarification regarding survey expectations and compliance obligations — areas that continue to generate questions throughout the industry.

One of the Most Active Q&A Sessions in Recent Memory

The conference concluded with an extensive roundtable question-and-answer session that utilized a newer structured format designed to encourage broader audience participation.  The result was one of the most active Q&A sessions many attendees could remember.

To their credit, the NYSDOL representatives remained engaged and attempted to address the large number of questions raised by attendees.

Some of the issues discussed included:

• Partial asbestos removal with encapsulated edges and flood cuts
• Interpretation of survey requirements
• Variance considerations
• Enforcement consistency
• Field compliance challenges

One particularly notable discussion involved bead blasting methods. NYSDOL representatives explained that refusals involving bead blasting are based on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documentation and agency experience indicating the equipment cannot be successfully used with water under those conditions.

These types of direct exchanges between regulators and industry professionals are one of the major reasons PACNY continues to provide such value to attendees year after year.

Final Thoughts

The 29th Annual PACNY Environmental Conference successfully returned to a three-day format and delivered another strong educational program covering technology, compliance, project design, exposure assessment, regulatory interpretation, and public health advocacy.  From discussions on AI and robotics to owner expectations, OSHA enforcement, and NYSDOL compliance updates, the conference reflected an industry continuing to evolve while facing increasingly complex regulatory and operational challenges.

NYSDOL representatives at the Conference

Perhaps most importantly, the conference once again reinforced the importance of communication between contractors, consultants, regulators, building owners, laboratories, and public health advocates. These conversations — even when difficult — are critical to improving worker protection, project quality, and regulatory compliance.

PACNY, its leadership, presenters, vendors, and attendees should be commended for putting together another outstanding conference.  If this year’s event is any indication, the environmental industry in NYS continues to move forward through collaboration, education, and honest discussion about the challenges we all face in the field every day.

PACNY 29th Annual Environmental Conference Part Two – Day Two Recap

Day Two of the Professional Abatement Contractors of New York (PACNY) 29th Annual Environmental Conference on February 26, 2026, at the Turning Stone Resort & Casino delivered a full schedule of technical presentations, regulatory updates, and practical field discussions, all complemented by strong engagement in the Vendor Exhibit Hall.

Future Environment Design's Team in the Vendor Hall

With the morning sessions split between the Mohawk and Tuscarora Rooms, attendees could tailor their experience to their discipline and interests while still coming together throughout the day in the Oneida Room for networking, lunch, and the always-popular Happy Hour.

Vendor Exhibit Hall Sets New Record

Before diving into the sessions, it’s worth highlighting that this year’s Vendor Exhibit Hall, located in the Oneida Room, featured 32 vendors, setting a new conference record.

This continues to reflect the industry's growth and the importance of direct interaction among service providers, manufacturers, trainers, consultants, and contractors. The exhibit hall remained active throughout the day, especially during lunch and the closing Happy Hour, providing valuable opportunities to connect and discuss new products, services, and technologies.

Morning Sessions – Mohawk Room

"Lead-Based Paint Regulations: Recent Changes & Updated Standards" by Brad Arthur, PE – Arthur Engineering DPC. The day began with a regulatory-focused presentation on lead-based paint, where one of the more notable updates discussed was the shift away from using the term “clearance.”  Instead, the industry is moving toward defined terminology using two distinct clearance-related levels:

• Work Completed
• Pre-Occupancy

2026 Changes to the Lead Standard

Brad also addressed the growing challenges associated with analytical methods at increasingly lower detection limits. The cost differences between methodologies were particularly eye-opening:

• Flame AA: approximately $4 per sample
• ICP: approximately $45 per sample

This has significant implications for project budgeting and laboratory selection as regulatory thresholds continue to tighten.

"The Science You Should Know" by Kevin Hutton – EAST Centers of NY.  Kevin delivered a science-driven session reinforcing the importance of understanding the “why” behind what we do in the field. While many of us operate within regulatory frameworks daily, revisiting the underlying science helps strengthen decision-making, interpretation of results, and overall credibility in the field.

"Exposure Assessments Under OSHA’s Asbestos Construction Standard" by Peter DeLucia – Riedman Companies. This presentation focused on the practical application of exposure assessments under 29 CFR 1926.1101, highlighting:

• Real-world compliance challenges
• Proper interpretation of exposure data
• The importance of defensible assessment strategies

The discussion resonated with many in the room, particularly regarding the gap between regulatory language and field implementation.

Morning Sessions – Tuscarora Room

"Immigration Enforcement: Know Your Rights – Employer Edition" by Michael Paglialonga, Attorney at Law, at Littler Labor & Employment Law Solutions.  This session provided a timely and important briefing on the evolving landscape of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and I-9 compliance, particularly in construction and hospitality sectors.  The key takeaway was clear:

• We are seeing a shift from historically routine, paper-based audits to more aggressive, high-frequency site inspections and enforcement actions, with projections reaching up to 15,000 audits annually.
• The emphasis has moved toward proactive compliance, or what was described as “preventative maintenance” of documentation, to avoid significant civil and potential criminal liability.

Michael Paglialonga, ICE Presenter, photo by Nathan Boor of AAC

"Workers’ Compensation: Protecting Yourself and Your Team" by Anthony Tomeselli – NYS Workers’ Compensation Board.  Anthony provided a comprehensive overview of workers’ compensation, focusing on:

• The distinction between business advocates and injured worker advocates
• Proper classification of independent contractors
• The implications of the Construction Industry Fair Play Act

This was a valuable reminder that misclassification and misunderstanding coverage requirements can have serious financial and legal consequences.

Anthony Tomeselli's points regarding the Business Advocate

"From Mold to Measurement: A Practical Overview of Mycotoxins" by Aaron Wilson – Hayes Microbial Consulting.  Aaron’s presentation highlighted the complexity of mycotoxins and their impact on indoor environmental quality.  One of the most critical takeaways:

• Mycotoxins are toxic at extremely low concentrations—parts per billion (ppb) and even parts per trillion (ppt).

This reinforces the need for careful interpretation of sampling data and a strong understanding of the limitations and capabilities of current analytical methods.

Aaron Wilson discussing types of mycotoxins

Afternoon Sessions

"Asbestos in Settled Dust – Is it a Valid Method?" Panel Discussion Panelists:

• Angelo Garcia, III – Future Environment Designs, Inc.
• Martin S. Rutstein, Ph.D. – Environmental Consulting and Management Services, Inc.
• Marc Rutstein – Environmental Consulting and Management Services, Inc.

This panel sparked significant discussion around one of the more debated topics in the industry—the validity and application of settled dust sampling for asbestos.  The conversation focused on:

• Whether it should be used as a screening or decision-making tool
• Interpretation challenges
• Regulatory limitations
• Real-world implications, including cost impacts when misapplied

We really enjoyed working with the Rutsteins in putting this presentation together.  Though Dr. Rutstein's review of our presentation made us feel like we were back in college working with our professors.  See our presentation below, and our slides can be found in our training library.

"Diversity in Safety – Inclusive Safety Designs" by Courtney Connelly – The El Group, Inc.  Courtney delivered an important session on designing safety programs that are not just compliant, but inclusive.  The focus was on providing equity tools—ensuring that all workers, regardless of background or ability, have access to the same level of protection.  This is an area that continues to evolve and deserves ongoing attention in safety program development.

Courtney Connelly discussing OSHA PPE Update

"From the People’s House to Every House" by Linda Reinstein – Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization.  Linda Reinstein presented from Washington, D.C., on enforcement gaps, accountability, and the current status of the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now (ARBAN) Act.  The central question: Where do we stand today?  The presentation reinforced:

• Ongoing regulatory gaps
• The need for comprehensive legislative action
• The human impact of delayed policy decisions

As always, Linda’s presentation grounded the technical discussions in real-world consequences and public health impact.

Linda Reinstein discussing asbestos disease 

"Common Compliance Issues in the Field" by Stacy Portnoy – New York State Department of Labor Asbestos Control Bureau.  Closing out the formal sessions, Stacy provided a practical look at common compliance issues observed in the field.  These types of presentations are always valuable, as they reflect what regulators are actually seeing on projects—often highlighting recurring issues that are entirely preventable with proper planning and oversight.

Stacy Portnoy discusses the most common violations in 2025

Closing the Day: Networking and Industry Engagement

The day concluded with the Happy Hour Networking Event in the Vendor Exhibit Hall.  With record vendor participation and strong attendee turnout, the room remained active and engaged. These interactions continue to be a key component of the conference—providing an opportunity to discuss challenges, share solutions, and strengthen professional relationships across the industry.  One of the interesting vendors was A2Z Environmental LLC because they have a battery-operated pump capable of sampling for asbestos (both NIOSH 7400 method and the AHERA TEM method) and mold (spore trap sampling).  See the video from the Happy Hour Networking Event below:

Final Thoughts

Day Two of the PACNY Conference successfully balanced technical depth, regulatory insight, and practical field application.  From evolving enforcement trends and analytical challenges to emerging discussions on equity and technology, the sessions reflected where the industry stands today—and where it’s heading.

Stay tuned for Part 3, where we’ll wrap up the final day of the conference and key takeaways

Related Articles:

• PACNY 29th Annual Environmental Conference Returns to Three-Day Format at Turning Stone

Update of Dust and Debris Sampling in New York State: What Asbestos Inspectors Need to Know

On July 16, 2016, we blogged about "Asbestos Dust Sampling in New York State," since that post had over 1,550 views and will be ten years old this year.  We thought we should update the post.  In addition, we were honored to be asked by Dr. Martin Rutstein to join him and Mr. Marc Rutstein in presenting at the 2026 Professional Abatement Contractors of New York (PACNY) 29th Annual Environmental Conference.  Our presentation is titled "Asbestos in Settled Dust - Is it a Valid Method in a Consultant's Toolbox?"  We look forward to seeing you at the conference and discussing this issue.  This issue is typically discussed in our asbestos inspector and designer classes, so many of you already know some of the issues.  These discussions are necessary because this is an area where misunderstandings, improper sampling, and incorrect laboratory analysis can lead to serious regulatory, financial, and legal consequences for building owners, contractors, and consultants alike (Dr. Martin Rutstein & Marc Rutstein will be discussing recent case histories).

Stop by and Interact with our New Display

Under New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) Industrial Code Rule 56, dust and debris are specifically identified as suspect miscellaneous asbestos-containing materials (ACM).  This means that any debris or dust that is visually assessed by an asbestos inspector must be treated and handled as ACM and assumed to be asbestos-containing until bulk sampling and analysis demonstrate otherwise.  The inevitable question that follows is a practical one: How do you collect bulk samples of debris and dust?

Scrape Sampling and NYSDOH ELAP Method 198.1

The most straightforward method is to physically collect the debris or dust by scraping it into an asbestos sample bag using a knife, scraper, or business card.  This collected material can then be submitted for analysis using the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) Method 198.1.

Sampling Tools - Tweezers are one of my favorites

The ELAP Method 198.1 is the standard polarized light microscopy (PLM) method, which utilizes dispersion staining and point counting.  When performed correctly by an ELAP-accredited laboratory, this method provides results in percent by weight (%), which allows the inspector to compare findings directly to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) definition of ACM - greater than 1% asbestos by weight.  We also have to take into account that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates materials that are 1% or less (see the Varga Letter in the FED Training Library).

Microvacuum Sampling and ASTM D5755

Another commonly used collection method is described in American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) D5755, Microvacuum Sampling and Indirect Analysis of Dust by Transmission Electron Microscopy for Asbestos Structure Number Concentrations. Note that the method has been withdrawn because of an administrative lapse and should be republished by the Fall of 2026.  This method involves vacuuming a known surface area—100 square centimeters is referenced in the standard, though the area may be larger or smaller depending on conditions.  The standard recommends that multiple independent samples are secured from the same area, and that a minimum of three samplesbe analyzed by the entire procedure.

The sample cassette and the nozzle must be submitted

Sampling is conducted using a standard 25- or 37-millimeter air sampling cassette equipped with either a mixed cellulose ester (MCE) or polycarbonate (PC) filter membrane with a pore size of 0.8 microns or smaller.  A plastic tube is attached to the inlet orifice to act as a nozzle and is cut at a 45-degree angle transverse to the sampling area of visible dust, avoiding particles > 1 millimeter.  Do not scrape the surface.  The air sampling pump is calibrated to operate at 2 liters per minute.  The sample cassette and the plastic tube (nozzle) must be submitted for analysis.

Nozzle example

While ASTM D5755 includes its own analytical method, this is where inspectors working in New York State must proceed with caution.  On April 8, 2011, NYSDOH published a document called "New York State Asbestos/Fibers - Frequently Asked Questions" (see the FAQ in the FED Training Library). According to NYSDOH ELAP Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) No. 8, all bulk samples collected must be analyzed using ELAP-approved methodologies at an ELAP-accredited laboratory.  ASTM D5755 is not an ELAP-approved method of analysis.  Therefore, when transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is desired, the required analytical method in NYS is ELAP Method 198.4.

Wipe Sampling and ASTM D6480

ASTM D6480, Standard Test Method for Wipe Sampling of Surfaces, Indirect Preparation, and Analysis for Asbestos Structure Number Concentration by Transmission Electron Microscopy, is another method used to collect dust and debris.  This approach involves wiping a known surface area - again, typically 100 square centimeters - with a particle-free, sealed-edge, continuous filament cloth, such as a cleanroom wipe with 50/50 alcohol/water (no ghost wipes or baby wipes).  Multiple passes, first horizontal, then vertical, then hit the corners. Record the area sampled.  Like D5755, this standard recommends that multiple independent samples be secured from the same area, and that a minimum of three samples be analyzed by the entire procedure.

Cleanroom wipes

As with D5755, ASTM D6480 also includes an analytical method that is not approved under NYSDOH ELAP.  For NYS compliance, samples collected via these methods must be analyzed using the ELAP Method 198.4.

The Analysis Matters More Than the Collection Method

This is where many inspectors encounter problems. NYS ELAP-approved laboratories should be advising inspectors that ASTM analytical methods cannot be used for regulatory determinations in New York State.  Unfortunately, we have seen numerous instances where this guidance was not provided or ignored.

Transmission Electron Microscope

The result is that inspectors receive data reported as asbestos structures per square centimeter.  While this may be useful for certain research or exposure characterization purposes, there is no federal or state regulatory standard that allows these results to be compared to a threshold for determining whether a material is asbestos-containing.

Despite this, some parties have used these results to declare areas contaminated or to classify dust and debris as ACM.  In several cases, this has led to building owners incurring cleanup costs in the thousands - or even millions - of dollars, based on analyses that cannot be tied to regulatory definitions.

It is also worth noting that ASTM itself acknowledges these limitations.  In the Significance and Use section of its standards, ASTM clearly states that these test methods do not establish building safety, habitability, or regulatory compliance, and that a direct relationship between surface asbestos measurements and human exposure does not currently exist.

Experience, Knowledge, and Regulatory Awareness Are Critical

When using ASTM collection methods for dust and debris, asbestos inspectors must be extremely careful - both in how samples are collected and, more importantly, in how results are interpreted and communicated.  Understanding NYS regulatory requirements, approved analytical methodologies, and the limitations of various testing approaches is essential.

Asbestos Inspector Initial Class

As with many aspects of asbestos inspections, experience and knowledge are key. Proper sampling, appropriate analysis, and accurate interpretation protect not only inspectors and their clients but also the credibility of our profession.

Future Environment Designs wishes all of you a Merry Holidays and a Happy New Year!

As we say goodbye to 2025 and welcome 2026, we reflect that 2025 was a really good year for Future Environment Designs, Inc. (FEDTC).  We trained over 1,000 individuals this past year, and over 870 of them reviewed us and gave us a 4.9 out of 5 evaluation on the over 25 different training programs we provided.  Our At Your Convenience Service provided respirator fit testing and medical evaluations for over 50 individuals.   As we continue to provide these different training programs and services into 2026, we look forward to partnering with more companies and individuals as we enter our 38th year in business.  We are still working on a balance between the company and our personal life (though in 2025, we did celebrate our 40th wedding anniversary by taking a three-week European Vacation).  Which is almost always intertwined.

Verona, Italy, to see the opera Carmen at the Colosseum

HERALD 2025 GreenBIZ Award 

Future Environment Designs was proud to announce that Angelo Garcia III, Principal-Industrial Hygienist and Founder, had been selected as a recipient of the HERALD 2025 GreenBIZ Award, presented by HERALD Community Newspapers and RichnerLIVE. The inaugural GreenBIZ Awards recognize Long Island companies and individuals leading the way in environmental sustainability and community impact. Mr. Garcia was chosen for his more than 30 years of commitment to improving environmental health and safety through education, advocacy, and industry leadership.  

Angelo Garcia, III, Awarded Green Biz Award

PACNY 2025/2026

We were honored to be re-elected to the Professional Abatement Contractors of New York (PACNY). board back in January.  The 2025 Environmental Conference was one of our most successful conferences ever.  Having the highest number of vendors in the Vendor Exhibit Hall.  The panel we put together went over very well. Read about last year's conference in our March 30, 2025, blog post.

Front Row - Tom Laubenthal & Matthew Brooks
Back Row - Chris Alonge, Marc Rutstein, & Angelo Garcia, III

The 2026 PACNY Environmental Conference registration and sponsorship sign-up have already opened.  Visit their website here to register or sign up for sponsorships.  We will have the pleasure of presenting with Martin Rutstein and Marc Rutstein of Environmental Consulting and Management Services, Inc., on "Asbestos in Settled Dust- Is it a valid method in a consultant’s toolbox? Two case studies."  It should be very entertaining.

The Fight to Ban Asbestos and Protect Workers From Asbestos Exposure continues.

In September, we attended the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization's (ADAO's) conference at Mt. Sinai Hospital in Manhattan, New York.  We learned about the continuing work going on regarding Dr. Irving Selikoff's legacy of protecting workers from asbestos exposure.  See our December blogpost regarding the conference.  At the conference, we learned about the industry challenge of the current ban, see our blog post “Chrysotile Asbestos Banned? More Like Certain Conditions of Use Will Be Eventually Banned!“ and the introduction of the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now (ARBAN) Act see our September blog post.  

BADGES: A Memorial Tribute to Asbestos Workers

So in 2026 we will be keeping watch regarding the industry challenge to the current ban, the status of ARBAN, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) progress on Legacy issues (see our December 2024 blogpost regarding this issue) and finally the Occupational Safety and Health Administraion (OSHA) proposed changes to the asbestos respirator requirements (see our August blogpost regarding this issue).

Having Fun in 2026

We will continue our podcast "After The Refresher" on our YouTube Channel, we're up to episode 4, and the podcasts have been well received (see our October blogpost regarding the podcast).  We look forward to continuing the episodes and interviewing various individuals who attend our classes.  We look forward to showcasing our new display at this year's PACNY Environmental Conference.  We would like to thank Tom Watral from Watral Brothers, Inc. for doing a promotional video regarding FEDTC's At Your Convenience services.

We are so grateful to all our clients for your loyalty and the support of our business.  We could never have made it to 38 years in business without it.  We would also like thank those who have helped our business operate these past years!  We wish you all a Merry Holiday and a Happy New Year season!

Rockefeller Christmas Tree, NYC

Future Environment Designs’ Angelo Garcia III Named 2025 HERALD GreenBIZ Award Winner

 October 2025 — Future Environment Designs is proud to announce that Angelo Garcia III, Principal-Industrial Hygienist and Founder, has been selected as a recipient of the HERALD 2025 GreenBIZ Award, presented by HERALD Community Newspapers and RichnerLIVE.

The inaugural GreenBIZ Awards recognize Long Island companies and individuals leading the way in environmental sustainability and community impact. Mr. Garcia was chosen for his more than 30 years of commitment to improving environmental health and safety through education, advocacy, and industry leadership.

Under Mr. Garcia’s direction, Future Environment Designs has become one of Long Island’s premier providers of asbestos, mold, indoor air quality, and OSHA compliance training—empowering professionals to create safer and healthier workplaces across New York State and the tri-state region.

“It’s an honor to be recognized among Long Island’s sustainability leaders. For more than three decades, our mission at Future Environment Designs has been to make workplaces safer and communities healthier through education, training, and advocacy.  This award reinforces our belief that protecting the environment and protecting people go hand in hand.” - Angelo Garcia III, Principal-Industrial Hygienist, Future Environment Designs, Inc.

Award recipients will be honored at the GreenBIZ Awards Gala on October 29, 2025, at The Heritage Club at Bethpage, celebrating sustainability leaders shaping a greener, healthier future for Long Island.

Future Environment Designs, Inc. Celebrates 37 Years in Business With a New Program Called "After The Refresher"

On October 5, 1988, Angelo Garcia, III, founded Future Environment Designs, Inc. (FEDTC) as an indoor air quality consulting and training service to the facility management sector.  Since then, we have transformed the company into a provider of asbestos, mold, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) compliance training.  That has enabled us to continue for 37 years, with plans to continue for at least another 13 years.  

Once we converted the company into a training company, we became completely focused on our Blue Ocean Strategy of separating our company from our competitors by including additional services in our training courses to meet our clients' needs.  Services like:

• supplying personal protective equipment (PPE),
• providing quantitative respirator fit testing,
• providing respirator medical evaluations, 
• our monthly Safety Suzy newsletter with content on asbestos, mold, indoor air quality, and occupational safety and health information, 
• our blog where we post items of interest and discussion, 
• our negative air app, 
• our air sampling charts, 
• our training library, 
• our partnership with SiteDocs, 
• and all of it found on FEDTC's website.

In keeping with our Blue Ocean Strategy, we are starting a program called "After the Refresher".  "After the Refresher" will consist of interviews and recordings with people who attended our refresher classes, where our attendees get to introduce themselves and we discuss some of the topics we covered in the refresher class.  As we develop this program, we hope to interview people at conferences and other events that have an impact on the asbestos, mold, and OSHA compliance business.

In our first episode above, we discussed the different items we are currently discussing in our asbestos refresher courses.  In our second episode below, we interviewed John Paciulli of Insight Environmental, Inc., on the new New York State Department of Labor fact sheet on asbestos surveys and how it would impact the asbestos and mold industries.  We also discuss issues regarding contamination assessments.

As we continue to develop these programs and services, we are looking forward to what the next 13 years have to offer.  When you watch these programs, please don't forget to subscribe to Future Environment Designs Training Center's YouTube Channel and hit the like button.  Thank you!

OSHA’s Proposed Asbestos Respirator Changes Raise Important Safety Concerns

As someone who has spent decades navigating the complexities of asbestos regulations, we recognize that clarity, practicality, and worker protection must be at the core of any regulatory update.  Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA's) recent proposal to revise certain respirator-related provisions within the asbestos construction standard (29 CFR 1926.1101) attempts that but it’s important for all of us in the industry to carefully evaluate how these changes impact worker protection, especially concerning respirator requirements.

Confusion about the 9/11 type of respirator/filter to wear

Three proposed changes stand out to us as potentially problematic:

1. Removing the HEPA Filter Requirement

For decades, HEPA filters have been the gold standard for respirators, protecting workers from asbestos fibers. The current OSHA standard mandates HEPA filters (P100 filters) on all powered and non-powered air-purifying respirators to ensure maximum filtration efficiency.

OSHA’s proposal to eliminate this specific HEPA filter requirement, citing updated National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) certification standards (42 CFR part 84), raises questions.  While newer filter types may meet certification requirements, HEPA filters’ proven reliability and high filtration efficiency have been foundational in asbestos protection.

The risk here is that removing the HEPA filter mandate could lead to the use of less effective filters (N95s) or confusion over filter equivalency, ultimately compromising worker safety.  The asbestos hazard is too severe to accept any uncertainty about filter performance.

2. Replacing Supplied-Air Respirators with PAPRs

Current OSHA standards require supplied-air respirators (SARs) operated in pressure-demand mode with an auxiliary positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) backup for exposures exceeding 1 (one) fiber per cubic centimeter (f/cc).  The proposed change to this section would replace the specific respirator requirement (SAR/SCBA, with an Assigned Protection Factor (APF) of 1,000) with a requirement to provide a respirator with a minimum APF of 1,000.  That would include a full-face Powered Air Purifying Respirator (PAPR) and helmet/hood PAPR (having manufacturer test evidence to support an APF of 1,000).

For high-level asbestos exposures, this shift is concerning. Supplied-air respirators provide a higher level of protection against variable airborne fiber concentrations, and the SCBA backup is critical for emergency scenarios.  Moving to PAPRs risks lowering the safety margin in situations where asbestos concentrations spike unexpectedly.

Workers wearing PAPRs 

3. Replacing PAPRs with Full Facepiece APRs

Another change to the current standard includes providing a tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirator (APF 1,000) or a full facepiece, supplied-air respirator operated in the pressure-demand mode, and equipped with either HEPA egress cartridges or an auxiliary positive-pressure, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) (APF 1,000) for exposure levels at or below 1 f/cc.  The proposed change would require employers to provide a respirator that has a minimum of an APF 50.  This would allow the use of a full-facepiece air purifying respirator (APR).  This is definitely not an increase in protection; it is a significant reduction of protection.

---

Why These Concerns Matter

Asbestos remains one of the most hazardous occupational exposures, with no safe level of exposure (according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)).  Respiratory protection is the last line of defense when engineering and work practice controls cannot fully eliminate airborne fibers.

Standards must err on the side of maximum protection, not convenience or cost savings.  Removing the HEPA filter requirement, substituting SARs with PAPRs, and PAPRs for full facepiece APRs for high-exposure Class I asbestos work would reduce protection levels at a time when new asbestos exposures still occur daily, and there are questions about whether the current permissible exposure limit is low enough.

Respirator Protection Types

---

What Are the Key Changes?

Replacing Specific Respirator Types with APF-Based Selection: Instead of mandating exact respirator models, employers will select respirators that meet or exceed required APFs (e.g., minimum APF of 50 or 1,000, depending on exposure scenarios).

Removing Redundant Provisions: OSHA is proposing to eliminate duplicative language in asbestos standards that overlaps with general respiratory protection requirements, simplifying the rules without adding burdens.

Updating Filter Requirements: The current HEPA filter mandate for air-purifying respirators is being reconsidered because NIOSH’s certification has evolved, allowing other certified particulate filters that offer equivalent protection.  The fact is that asbestos is not like any other particulate.  Because of the aerodynamics of the fiber and the size of the fibers, which can cause disease.  N95s do not provide equivalent protection to a HEPA filter.

Training Requirements Streamlined: OSHA intends to reduce duplicative respirator training provisions, relying more on the general respiratory protection standard’s comprehensive training requirements.

Asbestos Training Class

What Is OSHA Seeking From the Public?

OSHA is actively requesting comments on several points, including: 

• Concerns about potential decreases in worker safety from these proposed changes. 
• Alternative approaches to respirator provisions.
• The practicality and frequency of employees requesting PAPRs.
• Whether removing certain asbestos-specific provisions might lessen protections.
• The appropriateness of lifting the prohibition on filtering facepiece respirators.
• Employers' experiences with duplicative training requirements.

Final Thoughts

We support OSHA’s goal to update asbestos standards to reflect advances in technology and reduce unnecessary compliance burdens. However, changes to respirator requirements must be grounded in solid evidence and prioritize worker health above all.

OSHA’s proposal is a critical opportunity for industry stakeholders to weigh in. We must ensure that any revisions do not erode decades of hard-earned protection for workers facing asbestos hazards.

---

If you work with asbestos or manage respiratory protection programs, we urge you to review OSHA’s proposal carefully and submit comments highlighting these concerns before the comment period closes on November 1, 2025.

Still Not a #BanAsbestos: Over 40 Years in the Asbestos Industry and the Ongoing Fight for Real Change

As we celebrate our country's 249th anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence, recent events have caused us to spend some time reflecting on 37 years of business, and 43 years in the asbestos industry where we started, what’s changed, and what hasn’t.  Back then, we relied on beepers, phone cards, and typewriters to keep the wheels turning.  New York City Department of Environmental Protection's (NYCDEP's) "Not an Asbestos Project Form ACP5s" had to be ordered and picked up at NYCDEP and were typed by hand.  Manuals were several inches thick, and navigating them required patience—and maybe a magnifying glass.  Today, we have digital manuals, searchable PDFs, online filing systems (see our Training Library), smartphones that connect us instantly, and ACP5s that are filed online.

Yet despite all the technology and efficiency, the core of our work hasn’t changed: workers still need respirators, still need to take showers after abatement, still need negative pressure in the containment area, and still need to wet materials to keep dust down.  The tools have evolved, but the risks and the protocols remain stubbornly the same.  And the biggest constant of all?  Asbestos is still here.  

Asbestos Pipe Insulation

When we first opened our doors, people told us the asbestos problem would be solved in 5 or 10 years.  That was the thinking at the time—because how could a substance so toxic, so dangerous, remain legal in any form? (see our blog post "Future Environment Designs Celebrates 30 Years in Business in October. What the heck is SNUR?").

The book we wrote after 30 years in business

Yet here we are, over 40 years later, and we’re still talking about it.  Not only has asbestos not been banned, but what we’re now calling a “ban” - specifically, the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA's) Part 1 Final Rule on Chrysotile Asbestos - isn’t a ban at all.  In addition, the EPA plans to rewrite the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) rule on asbestos, leaving the ban’s status unclear (see Inside EPA).  

Cobbing Station with chrysotile asbestos

Let’s be honest: many of you probably read headlines like “EPA Bans Chrysotile Asbestos” and felt a wave of relief.  We did too—until we read the rule (see our blog post "Chrysotile Asbestos Banned? More Like Certain Conditions of Use Will Be Eventually Banned!").  The full title tells the real story:

“Asbestos Part 1 – Chrysotile Asbestos; Regulation of Certain Conditions of Use Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).”

That phrase—“Certain Conditions of Use”—should tell you everything. This isn’t a ban.  It’s a regulation of specific uses.  The media clearly needs a dictionary, because, by definition, a ban is to prohibit or forbid by legal means. That’s not what this rule does.

What the EPA has issued is a partial phase-out of chrysotile asbestos—one type of asbestos, in some uses, with long timelines, carveouts, and industry exceptions.

And it says nothing about the other types of asbestos: amosite, crocidolite, tremolite, actinolite, anthophyllite, or the Libby amphiboles.  None of these are addressed.

Asbestos Display Museum of Natural History

Let’s look closer.  The rule is 40 pages long (starting on page 21970 of the Federal Register), but the actual regulatory section is?  Just five pages long—starting at page 22005. The rule addresses:

• Chrysotile asbestos diaphragms in the chlor-alkali industry

• Sheet gaskets in chemical production

• Oilfield brake blocks and gaskets

• Aftermarket automotive brakes and linings

• Other vehicle friction products

• Interim workplace controls

• Disposal

• Recordkeeping

Here’s the devil in the details:

• As of May 28, 2024, the manufacture and import of chrysotile asbestos for chlor-alkali diaphragms is prohibited.

• Use of those diaphragms? Not prohibited until May 28, 2029, and even then, with exceptions that allow use until 2036 at certain facilities.

• For sheet gaskets, there’s an exception for titanium dioxide production until May 28, 2029, and for the Savannah River Site until December 31, 2037.

• Aftermarket brake parts and gaskets can still be used if already installed, even though we know from studies (including those on auto mechanics) that exposure during repair work is dangerous.

And if that’s not enough to make you question the strength of this so-called “ban,” remember the Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) issued in 2019. That rule allows companies to petition the EPA for permission to resume using asbestos in dozens of legacy products, including:

• Roofing felts

• Vinyl-asbestos floor tiles

• Electrical paper

• Sealants and coatings

• Beater-add gaskets

• Millboard

• Adhesives

• And more

Think about it: if these materials come back into use, every project involving them will need asbestos inspection and possible abatement. The asbestos abatement industry might never go away—and while that might sound good for business, it’s a horrifying thought for public health.

We find it troubling that while the EPA is creating tighter exposure standards—like their Interim Existing Chemical Exposure Limit (ECEL) of 0.005 f/cc, which is 20 times more protective than the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA's) current limit—they’re simultaneously allowing asbestos to linger in commerce for another decade or more.

In 2021, the Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) prepared an expert opinion for the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) on the scientific evaluation of occupational exposure limits for asbestos

Even their respirator guidance underscores the danger.  EPA is requiring supplied air respirators for exposure levels that OSHA still considers acceptable. That speaks volumes.

Supplied Airline Respirator

And while the EPA sets these rules, they’re also challenging them.  Under pressure from industry, the agency recently filed a motion to reconsider its own chrysotile asbestos rule, which will delay full implementation for at least 30 months.  That would be a massive setback.

In 2009, we interviewed Linda Reinstein on asbestos for my show, Keeping Your Family Safe 

Linda Reinstein, President and Co-Founder of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO), called it what it is: “a move that puts lives at risk.”  Listen to her at Reinstein Notebook “EPA’s Motion & Trump’s Administration Consideration of an Asbestos Ban Reversal”.

Here’s the thing: asbestos kills 40,000 Americans a year. This isn’t just about regulation—it’s about life and death.  And that’s why we support ADAO’s fight to pass the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act (ARBAN). This legislation would prohibit the manufacture, processing, use, and distribution of all forms of asbestos in commerce. Period. No loopholes, no exceptions.

We urge you to tell Congress to act. The ADAO has made it easy—use this link to contact your Representatives and Senators and demand a true, complete ban.

---

Tags: #BanAsbestosNow #ChrysotileMyth #EPARegulations #AsbestosKills #SNUR #TSCA #ARBAN #PublicHealth #AsbestosAbatement #ADAO #37YearsStrong #EnvironmentalJustice #AutoMechanicsAtRisk