Clearing Pipes With Natural Gas, A Common But Deadly Construction Practice

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

In Middletown, Connecticut on Febuary 7, 2010 an explosion caused the death of 6 workers building a power plant for Kleen Energy Systems.  The article above discusses the findings of an investigation of the cause of the explosion.  The findings found that a common construction practice of clearing pipes with natural gas was the cause of the explosion.  The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) investigation is still ongoing.  However, it appears the common practice of clearing pipes with natural gas is also a common cause of explosions at other construction sites.  In two other sites this practice has caused explosions that have killed 4 and 6, previously.  The article implies that this practice is unregulated, which I find hard to believe.  I guess we will find out once OSHA finishes its investigation.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Safety Board Weighs Response to Conn., NC Blasts (abcnews.go.com)
• Feds weigh response to fatal Conn., NC blasts (sfgate.com)
• Conn. urges tighter power plant rules after blast (seattletimes.nwsource.com)

Doomed Crane Had History of Malfunctions | New York Construction | McGraw-Hill Construction

Image via Wikipedia

Doomed Crane Had History of Malfunctions New York Construction McGraw-Hill Construction

The manslaughter trial of William Rappetti, master rigger, and his company Rappetti Rigging Services, began this week.  The Manhattan District Attorney maintains that Mr. Rappetti was responsible for the crane accident that happened on March 15, 2008.  While Mr. Rappetti's attorneys are trying to prove the accident was caused by a number of alternative causes.  Click the link above to get an update on the trial.  We will be following this trial and the other manslaughter trial against J. Lomma (see our post "Crane Case Heading to Court") both regarding the crane accidents that happened in 2008.  Depending how these trials turn out, will depend how much of an impact the Manhattan District Attorney's Office will have on the construction industry.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Safety Codes Lack Standards For Critical Crane Repairs (constructionlawva.com)
• Rigger declines jury in NYC crane collapse trial (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Crane-collapse survivor testifies at NYC trial (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Credit still tight for U.S. construction-survey (reuters.com)
• Witness: New straps supplied before NYC crane fell (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Witness: New straps supplied before NYC crane fell (sfgate.com)
• Trial opens for crane rigger in NYC collapse (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Trial set to open for rigger in NYC crane collapse (seattletimes.nwsource.com)

ADAO Responds to Potential Canadian Efforts to Revive Jeffrey Mine « ADAO – Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization

Image by LHOON via Flickr

ADAO Responds to Potential Canadian Efforts to Revive Jeffrey Mine « ADAO – Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization

As the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization notes, Quebec continues to consider chrysotile asbestos less dangerous than other forms of asbestos.  Since Jeffrey Mine, Inc.'s current mine has run out of asbestos, Quebec's government is offering $58 million dollar loan guarantee for Jeffrey Mine to open a new mine and continue mining asbestos.  Unfortunately, the market for this new asbestos is the Third World, where many industries are concerned more about staying in business versus human life.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Overseas demonstrations protest expansion of Quebec asbestos mine (canada.com)
• Asbestos industry in for boost (canada.com)
• Opening of the Jeffrey Underground Mine - Asbestos mobilizes broad support (newswire.ca)
• Letter to Quebec premier calls for halt on asbestos exports (canada.com)

BP's Other Toxic Legacy: 'Decades of Misery' for Gulf Health

Image via Wikipedia

BP's <i>Other</i> Toxic Legacy: 'Decades of Misery' for Gulf Health

As we feared, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) again is messing up worker protection under the memorandum of understanding (MOU). This time it didn't take long for people to start being concerned about their exposure to chemicals. This article from Esquire Magazine's Politics Blog shows that OSHA really doesn't have a handle on the exposure of the workers down there. In addition, where is the American Industrial Hygiene Association in all of this? I have not heard about a position or any recommendations from this organization regarding what is going on in the Gulf regarding worker protection. So here we are again another disaster and another OSHA MOU, which means allow workers to develop illnesses (from chemical expsoures) because these aren't reported the same way accidents are (slips, trips, falls, etc). I'm sure OSHA will brag about zero accidents like they did at 9/11 but will ignore the illnesses developed. Note the recent news articles about the $700 million settlement that will be paid to thousands of 9/11 responders exposed to toxic World Trade Cener dust, that OSHA could have and should have prevented from happening.

Related articles by Zemanta

• BP Needs to Provide Respirators for Cleanup Workers (fdlaction.firedoglake.com)
• Gina Solomon: OSHA Limits Don't Protect Gulf Coast Workers (huffingtonpost.com)
• Gina Solomon: BP Coughs Up Another Drop of Air Quality Data: Not Reassuring (huffingtonpost.com)
• EPA demands a less toxic dispersant in Gulf spill (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• OSHA Fronts for BP After Congressmen Press for Worker Safety (workinprogress.firedoglake.com)
• Rep. Maloney: Address Health of Gulf Cleanup Workers Now, Before They Lose It (workinprogress.firedoglake.com)
• Gulf Oil Spill: Louisiana Officials Ask OSHA To Investigate Cleanup Safety (huffingtonpost.com)

Spring 2010 Future Focus Posted

Image by odysseyfx via Flickr

Future Environment Designs has posted its Spring 2010 newsletter finalizing our coverage of the revisions to the New York City asbestos regulation Title 15.  This issue we discuss the changes to the work procedures/practices.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Editorial: Building Inspection Scandal in New York City (nytimes.com)
• Major New Study of Libby Asbestos Starts (abcnews.go.com)
• Major new study of Libby asbestos starts (seattletimes.nwsource.com)

PCBs are Everywhere?

Image via Wikipedia

It feels like lately, everywhere I turn I find a new article or seminar discussing polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) issues.  In the Metropolitan New York Chapter of American Industrial Hygiene Association's newsletter I learned that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently holding a series of public meetings for the purpose of “Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the EPA potential reassessment of PCB use authorizations” (follow link from the title of this article for more information).  Even on this blog I have written several posts on PCBs (see my most recent post on 4/6/10).  Back in April, I attended the joint meeting of the New York Metro Chapter of the AIHA and the Long Island chapter of the American Society of Safety Engineers (see post on 4/20/10). Mr. Kristen Panella of New York Institute of Technology gave a very good presentation on dealing with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding transformers containing PCBs. The main points of the presentation were:

• EPA does not allow “placard” transformers (meaning the transformer has pyranol on the label or placard) to be registered after 1998.  EPA’s reason for this is that General Electric’s pyranol transformers contain 50% PCBs be weight.
• These placard transformers are required to be removed. The penalty is $24,000 for not removing them.
• The removal process is a costly and very delicate process because any spill of the PCB oil makes the project a remediation (spill clean-up) having different requirements.

Then in the April 2010 issue of Indoor Environment Connections, Ronald Smith and Vincent Daliessio of EMSL wrote an article on “PCB in Caulk: A New/Old Indoor Contaminant” (http://www.ieconnections.com/pdfs/newsletter/2010/IEC-04-2010.pdf on page 18).  The main points from this article were:

• PCB-tainted caulk with concentrations of 50 parts per million (ppm) or more can cause owners of buildings (including schools, etc.) to face EPA fines of $3,000 and $25,000 per day until the material is removed.
• EPA regulations do not require schools to test for PCBs but EPA is encouraging schools to conduct air testing where PCB use is suspected.  This recommendation is inconsistent with other indoor air quality programs (i.e., asbestos or lead) that would first require identifying or testing to confirm the presence of the material prior to an air sampling regimen.  I suspect the reasoning for this is; unlike with asbestos or lead, if the school finds PCBs in the caulk above 50 ppm they are required to remove it, as per the above point.
• There are a number of exposure guidelines and standards for chlorodiphenyl (54% chlorine in PCBs) in air:
• ACGIH – TLV is 500 ug/m3
• OSHA – PEL is 500 ug/m3
• NIOSH – REL is 1 ug/m3
• NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene – Action Level is 0.5 ug/m3
• EPA – Risk-Based Concentrations (RBCs) is 0.0043 ug/m3
• Testing of caulk for PCBs is a unique method and should be discussed with your laboratory.  PCB air testing uses two methods, recognized by the EPA, TO-4A (high volume air) and TO-10A(low volume air).  EPA does not recognize NIOSH method 5503.

In addition, two recent EPA Region 2 news releases were also regarding PCBs.  On this blog, we have been following the dredging operations on the Hudson River.  EPA’s news release on April 26, 2010 announced that EPA agreed to pay the additional costs incurred by the towns of Halfmoon and Waterford to draw water from the Troy system until November 2012 because both towns used the Hudson River as their source of drinking water.  Some of the samples taken at the Thompson Island monitoring station were reported to have exceeded EPA’s drinking water standard of 500 parts per trillion (ppt) for PCBs, during dredging operations and off-season high river flows.  The second EPA region 2 news release was on April 30, 2010 and it too, discussed PCBs. PCBs are one of the contaminants they are investigating in the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site in New York City.

Even though Congress and EPA banned and phased out in 1979 all PCBs, we are still working on preventing further damage and cleaning up the old damage done to the environment are these future employment opportunities?

Related articles by Zemanta

• The EPA on GE on PCBs (timesunion.com)
• GE: Limit PCB contamination during Hudson dredging (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• PCB Dredging hearings in final day (timesunion.com)
• APNewsBreak: GE Says Hudson Dredging Cost $561M (abcnews.go.com)
• Feds and DEC: Continue Hudson River PCB dredging (timesunion.com)

New Lead Paint Regulation Goes Into Effect - Happy Earth Day!

Image by wayneandwax via Flickr

Today is the 40th Birthday of Earth Day.  To celebrate the occasion, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Lead Based Paint (finalized in April 2008) regulation goes into effect today.  The regulation we are talking about is the Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) rule.  The purpose of this rule is prevent lead poisoning of children.  Starting today anyone who is paid to perform work that disturbs paint in housing and child-occupied facilities built before 1978, including all general contractors, maintenance staff, and special trade contractors (such as painters, plumbers, carpenters, and electricians), are required to be trained on lead-safe work practices (become certified renovators), requires the firms to be EPA-certified, and requires the use of lead-safe work practices.  In addition, the regulation requires the firms to keep records for three years of reports certifying that lead-based paint is not present, records relating to the distribution of the lead pamphlet, signed and dated opt-out clauses, and documentation of compliance with RRP.  These regulations do not apply if the firm obtained a signed statement from the owner (known as the opt-out provision) or the work is considered a minor repair and maintenance activitiy that disturb six square feet or less of paint per room inside, or 20 square feet or less on the exterior of a home or building.  The rule require firms performing renovations must ensure that:

• All individuals performing activities that disturb painted surfaces are either certified renovators or have been trained by a certified renovator.
• A certified renovator is assigned to each renovation and performs all of the certified renovator responsibilities.
• All renovations use lead safe work practices.
• Pre-renovation education requirements are performed, such as distribution of the Renovate Right pamphlet.
• Recordkeeping requirements are met.

Violators of this regulation can face penalties of up to $32,500 per violation, per day.  Needless to say if you have not taken this training and applied for EPA certification you cannot perform renovation work on housing or child-occupied facilities until you get your certification.  EPA has up to 90 days after receiving a complete request for certification to approve or disapprove the application.  EPA has said "it does not intend to take enforcement actions against firms who applied for firm certification before April 22 and are just waiting for their paperwork."  EPA also said "they anticipate that all applications filed before April 22 will be reviewed by June."  Based on EPA's website they estimate there are 129,000 to 150,000 trained certified renovators by today.  It would seem those certified renovators are going to be very busy. 

Related articles by Zemanta

• New EPA Rule Requires More Care Around Lead Paint (abcnews.go.com)
• New EPA rule requires home renovators to take more care around lead paint (thenewstribune.com)
• New EPA rule requires more care around lead paint (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Childhood Lead Poisoning Proves a Stubborn Nemesis (nytimes.com)
• Rule on Lead Safety Set to Take Effect (nytimes.com)
• Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting Program Law-Important Legal Issues (constructionlawva.com)
• Earth Day Activities: Send Us Your Photos (huffingtonpost.com)
• Testing for Lead in Paint Gets Easier, Faster and Cheaper with ANDalyze Technology - Powered by DNA (eon.businesswire.com)