NYS Toxic Mold Task Force Completes Final Report

Section 1384 of the New York State (NYS) Public Health Law established the NYS Toxic Mold Task Force.  The goals of the NYS Toxic Mold Task Force was to:

• assess and measure, based on scientific evidence, the adverse environmental and health effects of mold exposure, including specific effects on population subgroups at greater risk of adverse effects;
• assess the latest scientific data on mold exposure limits;
• identify actions taken by state and local government and other entities;
• determine methods to control and mitigate mold;
• and prepare a report to the Governor and Legislature.

To achieve these goals the NYS Toxic Mold Task Force activities were organized into four main areas of inquiry:

• health effects of molds in indoor environments;
• exposure limits and assessment of mold in buildings;
• approaches to mold mitigation and remediation;
• building codes, regulations and other actions taken by other governments and private-sector organizations that relate to building mold problems.

In reading the executive summary it is clear that the NYS Toxic Mold Task Force came to the usual conclusions regarding mold that the many in the industry already know.  For example:

• Since mold problems in buildings are preventable with proper building construction, maintenance, and housekeeping aimed at preventing excess building dampness, mold exposure is preventable.
• Overabundant growth of any mold or other dampness-related organisms is undesirable and can be addressed by removing contaminants and correcting water problems.  Whether or not exposure to mold toxins is likely when mold growth occurs in a damp building does not substantially change the need for mitigation of the water and mold problem.
• Continue to improve building code requirements that address building design, construction techniques, and property maintenance so that they prevent or minimize the potential for water problems to occur.
• The presence and power of the code enforcement official (CEO) can also help minimize the potential mold problems in buildings when approving construction documents, during construction inspections of new buildings, and when issuing property-maintenance violations related to moisture conditions in existing buildings during required inspections.
• Regulating the mold assessment and remediation service industry is dependent upon how desirable it is to have persons poperly trained and following acceptable protocols.  The main public health goal of any regulation or additional guidance to the mold industry will be to reduce the potential for mold exposures and the risk of health effects in damp buildings.  Costs for such a program can range from $150,000 for using already developed general recommended work practices and certification programs to $4.5 million per year for a full regulatory program like the NYS asbestos program.
• The development of reliable, health-based quantitative mold exposure limits is not currently feasible.
• Their is limited evidence of the benefits of chemical disinfectants or encapsulant treatments for mitigating or preventing mold growth on building materials.
• The main approach to mold control and mitigation should be focused on identifying and repairing water damage in buildings and removing mold source materials.  This method of mitigation is less complicated to implement than mitigation based on attaining a numerical clearance critertion, because the main goal is to return the building to a clean and dry condition.

The document is 150 pages including tables and exhibits.  It will be interesting to see if this document actually goes anywhere in regulating the mold assessment and remediation industry.

Related articles

• Tenant, landlord of Watervliet apartment at odds over source of mold infestation (troyrecord.com)
• Beware: Toxic Mold (time.com)
• Timesunion.com: Mold is causing tenant to move (timesunion.com)
• Proper Roofing Maintenance Keeps the Threat of Mold at Bay (eon.businesswire.com)

New York Times Lists the Top 10 Reasons Small Businesses Fail

Image via WikipediaNew York Times posted an excellent article regarding the top 10 reasons small businesses fail.  As a small business owner myself I can say that all of these are definitely issues that make it hard to run a business over a long period of time.  Poor accounting, lack of a cash cushion, and operational inefficiencies have all played a part at one time or another for causing me problems with running my business.  However, though at times I have looked back and said what was I thinking going into business for myself, I feel it has been one of the best decisions in my life.  I highly recommend that if you have this dream you go out and just do it!

Related articles

• Will Selling Your Business Make You Happy? (inc.com)
• Talking Small Business With the New York Times (ducttapemarketing.com)
• You're the Boss: This Week in Small Business: Going Mobile (boss.blogs.nytimes.com)
• Can Small-Business Owners Save Congress? (smallbusiness.aol.com)
• Outlook for Small Businesses in 2011 (online.wsj.com)

Happy New Year One & All

Angelo Garcia III at a Metro NY AIHA meeting 

I would like to thank all of you for making 2010 a very good year.  I look forward to continuing to provide you with information, assistance, and services that help you with your business in 2011.  I promise to continue to improve Future Environment Designs, this blog, and all the services we provide to keep it up-to-date and as fresh as it can be. 

Related articles

• Wish Happy New Year In Many Languages: Feliz ano Nuevo 2011 (nowpublic.com)
• 2011 in Roman Numerals: Happy New Year 2011- Happy New Year MMXI (nowpublic.com)
• AIHA Survey Indicates Issues That Concern Industrial Hygiene Profession (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• AIHA Top Public Policy Occupational And Environmental Health And Safety Issues (ehssafetynews.wordpress.com)

Paul Mancuso of Utica New York Ordered to Pay $17,972 to EPA

HVAC ducts insulated with chrysotile asbestos.

We have discussed this case in our asbestos refresher classes and slowly but surely it is getting resolved.  Paul Mancuso of Utica, New York was ordered to pay back $17,972.68 it cost the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to clean up toxic piles of asbestos that were illegally dumped in a rural Herkimer County field.  On Tuesday, December 28, the prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig Benedict, said it is satisfying to know that Paul Mancuso will have to pay some financial penalty for what he has done.  “We’re pleased that the judge has found Paul Mancuso responsible for repaying the taxpayers of the United States for money expended to clean up the asbestos that was illegally dumped as a result of the Mancusos’ criminal activities,” Benedict said.

Related articles

• Colorado Man's Home is a Living Laboratory. (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• The EPA Tracks Down its Asbestos-Abetting Fugitive (sierraclub.typepad.com)
• Environmentalists petition Nitish to stop asbestos factory (thehindu.com)
• Window Company Owner Fined Following Asbestos Exposure (first4lawyers.com)
• Government Refuses to Act on Cancer-Causing Insulation (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Woman Wanted by E.P.A. Is Arrested (nytimes.com)
• Licensed Lead and Asbestos Inspector Sentenced to 63 Months in Prison (futureenv.blogspot.com)

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Freeport

Image via WikipediaCarbon monoxide that seeped out from a faulty heating system at La Mar Plastic Packaging on Tuesday December 28, 2010 sent dozens of people to the hospital - two with serious injuries - Nassau County fire and village officials said.  La Mar Plastic Packaging located at 216 N. Main St. in Freeport, called Freeport Firefighters about 10:30 a.m., and rescuers evacuated dozens of people complaining of headaches, dizziness and nausea from the structure, said Vincent McManus, a district supervisor for the Nassau fire marshal's office.
After a preliminary investigation, fire officials, members of the Freeport Building Department and the county's hazardous materials team determined that the deadly gas came from hanging gas-fired heaters in the building, McManus said.
Mark Stuparich, an assistant chief for the Freeport Fire Department, said it was unlikely the building was equipped with a carbon-monoxide detector. "The thing would have been going off all morning," he said.  Assistant Chief Stuparich said readings of indoor air showed upward of 500 parts per million (ppm) of carbon monoxide.  According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), normal indoor levels are 5 ppm or less.  According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the permissible exposure limit is 50 parts per million or less in an eight-hour period.

Related articles

• Carbon Monoxide May Be Greater Threat in Winter (nlm.nih.gov)
• RMs balk at carbon monoxide detectors law (cbc.ca)
• Carbon monoxide sends 31 to Sask. hospital (cbc.ca)
• Carbon monoxide detectors to be mandatory in all Manitoba homes: report (thestar.com)
• Carbon-monoxide fumes likely killed 5 teens in motel (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• 5 dead in Florida motel room carbon monoxide poisoning (ctv.ca)
• Fire officials urge carbon monoxide detectors (ajc.com)
• Health Update: Avoid Carbon Monoxide Poisoning (harlemworldblog.wordpress.com)

Licensed Lead and Asbestos Inspector Sentenced to 63 Months in Prison

Image via WikipediaOn December 21, 2010, Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, aanounced that Saverio Todaro was sentenced to 63 months in prison for falsifying lead and asbestos inspection and testing reports for residences and other locations throughout the New York City area.  In addition, he was ordered to forfeit $304,395 and to pay $107,194 in restitution to the victims of his crimes and a fine of $45,000.  Mr. Todaro pled guility on March 6, 2010 to an 11-count indictment charging him with five counts of false statements, three counts of mail fraud, and three counts of violations of the Toxic Substances Control Act.  The sentences was imposed by U. S. District Judge Kimba M. Wood.
As we have discussed in our classes, this case has focused a bad light on the asbestos and lead consulting field.  This case will bring scrutiny and focus on the work of asbestos and lead inspectors throughout New York State and New York City.  In imposing the senence, Judge Wood stated that Todaro's crimes were "monumental."  Judge Wood noted that the health of New York City children and adults "heavily depends on inspectors" such as Todaro, and that the public "needs to be able to trust" them.  She stated that the sentence needed to send a message to all New York City inspectors that they are guardians of the public trust and that dishonesty in inspections will be punished.
There is no question that the acts of this individual were so outrageous it is not typical of the industry.  Realize this like Roslyn School District has changed the way things are done in schools.  This case may have similar impacts on our industry.  Asbestos and lead inspectors should be very carefull going forward in ensuring your inspections are performed in accordance with the regulations and standards for asbestos and lead.

Related articles

• Scam-artist asbestos inspector gets jail time (nydailynews.com)
• NYC DEP Plans Increase In Enforcement On Asbestos Investigators (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Audits Planned for Asbestos Inspections (green.blogs.nytimes.com)
• New York Increases Monitoring of Asbestos Inspectors (nytimes.com)
• Stronger Oversight of Asbestos Inspections (cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com)
• NYCDEP Requesting Comments On Proposed Changes to Asbestos Regulations (futureenv.blogspot.com)

AIHA Survey Indicates Issues That Concern Industrial Hygiene Profession

Image via WikipediaThe American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) conducts a biennial public policy survey of its members to determine concerns for the industrial hygiene profession in 2011-2012.  The survey was conducted on-line in October, 2010.  The AIHA uses the survey to list the top public policy issues of concern to AIHA members and the occupational and environmental health and safety (OEHS) profession over the next two years.  AIHA will review existing white papers and position statements, as well as draft new position statements, to determine the appropriate response to each of the issues.

Overall the Top Issues for 2011-2012 are:

• Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) – Updating The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) PELs are consensus-based limits that indicate how long an individual can be exposed to a particular substance without experiencing harmful effects. The occupational health and safety profession considers PELs to be one of the most basic tools needed to protect workers. However, many PELs have not been updated since the 1960s and 1970s. Science in this area has matured, but the PELs have not. AIHA continues to work with OSHA, Congress and others to reach a consensus on the best way to update the PELs.
• Injury and Illness Prevention Program (I2P2) - OSHA is developing a rule to require employers to establish and maintain an Injury and Illness Prevention Program. It involves identifying and controlling hazards as well as planning, implementing, evaluating and improving processes and activities that protect employee safety and health. AIHA has been providing leadership in the development of OHS management science and practice since its inception. AIHA supports the need and importance in defining effective occupational health and safety programs and the acceptance in the IH and safety community that hazard assessment and implementation of a written safety and health program are parts of minimum acceptable professional practice on any work site.
• Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) / Globally Harmonized System (GHS) AIHA supports efforts to improve the accuracy of MSDS and supports efforts to improve hazard communication for employers and employees. Such efforts are also a crucial element in protecting workers and others in case of national emergencies. A major part of improving hazard communication is adoption of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). AIHA supports adoption of the GHS.
• Professional Recognition/Title Protection - This issue continues to appear in the top public policy issues for AIHA, as it has since 1993. Professional recognition/title protection allows industrial hygienists and others who have met minimum educational and experience requirements (such as certified industrial hygienists and certified safety professionals) to be legally defined and recognized as competent to perform certain work without the need for additional requirements. One area of concern is the continued influx of specific occupational health and safety titles that are awarded by non-accredited bodies and the attempt to recognize these titles in various policy making activities. AIHA continues to educate federal and state policymakers about the importance of recognizing those professionals who have received education and certification from nationally recognized and accredited organizations.
• OSHA Reform and NIOSH Recognition - Each year Congress introduces and considers legislation to amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act. This legislation addresses many parts of the OSH Act, including criminal penalties, whistleblower protections, expansion of coverage, and the Voluntary Protection Program. AIHA supports efforts to review and amend the OSH Act if changes provide added protection for workers. AIHA also supports efforts to protect the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) from attempts to diminish the importance of the Institute and its research. AIHA supports appropriations to adequately fund both OSHA and NIOSH.
• Laboratory Accreditation  - Accredited laboratories are the best way to ensure that test samples of potential workplace hazards are analyzed correctly. AIHA continues working to see that the AIHA laboratory accreditation program is internationally recognized and noted in federal and state legislation and regulation as one of the programs with recognition and acceptance.

For further information regarding AIHA's top policy issues for 2011–2012, please contact Aaron Trippler at atrippler@aiha.org.

Related articles

• AIHA Top Public Policy Occupational And Environmental Health And Safety Issues (ehssafetynews.wordpress.com)
• Review of Northeast Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition (futureenv.blogspot.com)