Asbestos Article in Indoor Environment Discusses Cross Issues with Radon

In the March 2011 issue of Indoor Environment Connections, Douglas Kladder the Director of the Center for Environmental Research & Training in Colorado Springs, Colorado wrote an excellant article regarding asbestos.  Being on the asbestos side of the fence, it is interesting how sometimes we get tunnel vision in dealing with indoor air quality/environmental issues.  Mr. Kladder article "Asbestos? What Asbestos? I'm a Radon Guy!" discusses the dangers of tunnel vision.  Mr. Kladder discusses that their are few activities involved in radon mitigation that would not impact asbestos containing materials.  He then provides several war stories of issues related to this topic.  In many ways the same statement can be made to those of us in the asbestos field.  We tend to get tunnel vision regarding asbestos and forget that lead, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) or, even for that matter, radon may also be a concern.  For example, lead paint could be on asbestos siding or asbestos spackles/joint compounds, and window caulk, in addition to containing asbestos, may also contain lead and/or PCBs.  It is important for indoor air quality/environmental professional to keep abreast of the field and to consider the potential possibilities of various environmental hazards being present.  

Related articles

• New York State Releases FAQ on Asbestos Analysis (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Indoor Air Pollution and how it affects your Long-term health (easyayurveda.com)
• Board Member of Queens Cooperative Has An Asbestos Question (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Charted Average Levels of Radon Exposure in the Home (digitalnewsgathering.wordpress.com)
• Radon (7thstreetannarbor.wordpress.com)
• Invisible and Odorless, Radon Poses Risks to Lungs (nlm.nih.gov)

New York State Releases FAQ on Asbestos Analysis

Image via WikipediaLate last week we received a FAQ from New York State Department of Health.  The FAQ is focused on analyzing asbestos samples and the environmental laboratory accreditation program.  The FAQ has several interesting piece of information.  Those of you who attend my classes, have heard me discuss the problems with analyzing vermiculite and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) statement that asbestos inspectors should not sample the material but should assume the material is asbestos.  Well Question 10 in this document states "Since there is currently no approved analytical methodology to reliably confirm vermiculite as non-asbestos containing it is best to assume vermiculite is contaminated with asbestos and proceed accordingly."  We will add this document to all our course manuals, and/or you can access the document at: http://futureenvironmentdesigns.com/Media/NYS%20Asbestos%20FAQ%20%20April%208-2011%20(2).pdf.

Related articles

• Condo Covered In Asbestos Dust in Virginia Beach, VA (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• CDC's NIOSH says WHAT about asbestos??? (scienceblogs.com)
• Air has high asbestos levels at Que. worksites: study (cbc.ca)
• Building owner guilty in asbestos case (newdayunderwriting.wordpress.com)
• Board Member of Queens Cooperative Has An Asbestos Question (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Libby, Mont., asbestos victims consider $43M deal (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Asbestos Expert Demands Canada Retract "Safe Use" Statement (futureenv.blogspot.com)

Asbestos Expert Demands Canada Retract "Safe Use" Statement

Image via WikipediaLeslie Stayner, an asbestos expert at the University of Illinois's school of public health and a key member of the Canadian Government's expert panel on asbestos is demanding Natural Resources Minister Christian Paradis retract recent comments that cited the group's report to promote the "safe use" of asbestos. The expert report, provided to the government in March 2008, was released 13 months later after a long delay under access to information legislation. Paradis, who represents the Quebec town where asbestos is mined, earlier this month told media in Quebec that the government has "adopted a clear position and there have been no new facts since then. Our position remains the same, that of promoting the safe use of asbestos," said Paradis.

However, Leslie Stayner, sent a letter sent to Paradis last week and obtained by Postmedia News, says the comments to the media are a "total misrepresentation" of the expert panel's report, commissioned by Health Canada.  The letter to Paradis, Stayner said the expert panel was never asked to address the question of whether chrysotile asbestos could be used safely.  "Had we been asked this question, I would certainly not have supported the argument that the continued production and use of asbestos in any form, including chrysotile, is safe. It is impossible to believe that developing countries such as India will be able to use chrysotile asbestos in a manner that protects public health when more technically advanced countries like Canada and the United States have failed to do so," Stayner wrote to Paradis.

Visit Canada.com for the full article at: http://www.canada.com/health/Expert+demands+feds+retract+statement+safe+asbestos/4517500/story.html.  It seems Canada (Quebec) is determined to show that chrysotile asbestos should not be regulated and their is a potential safe use for chrysotile asbestos.  We will see if Quebec reopens the Asbestos mine.

Related articles

• Expert demands feds retract statement on 'safe' use of asbestos (canada.com)
• Quebec's asbestos industry could lose union support (ctv.ca)
• Ignatieff fundraiser to be hosted by asbestos supporter (ctv.ca)
• BBC asbestos report slams Canada (cbc.ca)
• Global asbestos trade (bbc.co.uk)
• Asbestos mine backer helped raise cash for federal, Quebec Liberals (canada.com)
• Air at many Quebec worksites high in asbestos levels: study (theglobeandmail.com)
• Duceppe wades into asbestos mining debate (cbc.ca)

Board Member of Queens Cooperative Has An Asbestos Question

Habitat Magazine does twice a month podcast where they invite a New York co-op or condo board director to ask a legal question, and they host a panel of attorneys who address it.  In this podcast, Karen Ward, a board director of a 67-unit co-op in Queens, is facing an asbestos problem.  The board president of her co-op had hired a contractor to remove asbestos in their meeting room and a tenant' apartment.  The contractor was not licensed to do this type of work, and the proper disposal protocols were not followed.  According to Ms. Ward, the building is now facing fines and penalties.  Find the podcast at: http://www.habitatmag.com/rss/feed/podcast
 

The podcast was interesting to listen to on how the panel of attorneys address this issue.  First, the panel did not include a specialist (environmental attorney) in this type of problem.  These attorneys said they would bring on an environmental attorney, which should have been done as part of the podcast.  However, the individuals on the panel acknowledge their limited knowledge of the regulations impacting this issue and made excellant recommendations on how this individual should handle this problem.  Including potentially removing the President, calling the insurance company, and possibly even calling the regulatory agencies.  Highly recommend this podcast for Co-op and Condo Board members considering asbestos removal. 

Related articles

• Lynnfield asbestos removal company, owners indicted (newdayunderwriting.wordpress.com)
• Asbestos found in Uptown Kingston canopies (newdayunderwriting.wordpress.com)
• Building owner guilty in asbestos case (newdayunderwriting.wordpress.com)
• Dollar Tree Store in Newport fined for asbestos violations; repairs scheduled (newdayunderwriting.wordpress.com)
• Condo Covered In Asbestos Dust in Virginia Beach, VA (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Asbestos Controversy in Troy New York. (futureenv.blogspot.com)

Hazardous Waste In Landscape Mulch

Image via WikipediaLong Island Business News reported yesterday that Victor Liotta, owner of an Oceanside company,  Liotta Bros. Recycling Corporation, was arrested and is being charged of scheming to defraud, prohibited disposal of solid waste, operation of a solid waste management facility without a permit and misbranded or adulterated fertilizer. 
The arrest occurred after a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) engineer uncovered that a sample of wood chips from Liotta’s landscaping company contained altered wood and demolition debris, including plastic chips, floor tiles, rags, sheet metal and rubber.

Liotta Bros. Recycling Corporation, operates a solid waste management facility in Oceanside and a retail store called “Island Hopper Landscape Supplies” in Island Park.
Floor tiles being part of the waste in the mulch brings up the question is it asbestos containing or not.  If it is asbestos the mulching process obviously makes it friable and would make it regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a category I nonfriable that has become friable.  Hopefully, not many people used this company's products.  It will be interesting to see how this is handled.

Related articles

• Long Island Landscaper Accused Of Selling Bad Mulch (newyork.cbslocal.com)
• Second Solid Waste Management Research Forum on 8th November 2010 (solidwasteforum.wordpress.com)
• Meeting to discuss new play equipment in Washington Park (centraldistrictnews.com)
• $50,000 for Seattle's top waste-reduction neighborhood (seattletimes.nwsource.com)

Restoration & Remediation Magazine - The RRP Rule: One Year Later

In this month's issue of Restoration & Remediation Magazine, Mr. John Banta wrote an excellant article regarding the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Lead Paint regulation - Renovation, Remodeling, & Painting Rule.  The article covers the history of the rule and discusses enforcement issues.

As the article discusses the roll-out period for firms to become certified by filing their paperwork and paying their fees to the EPA, as well as for the Certified Renovators supervising these jobs to be trained, was extended to the end of 2010, but the effective date for using lead safe work practices remained April 22, 2010.  As Mr. Banta indicates in his article "this means...that any firm performing work for hire in target housing or child-occupied facilities built prior to 1978 is required to follow the regulations, even if their paperwork hasn’t been processed or even filed."  However, this grace period is over.

The EPA may audit the records of any firm in violation of the regulation for up to three years after the job is complete and be fined up to $37,500 per occurrence per day. If the violation of the law is willful, the fine can be doubled and jail time may be assigned by the courts.  This law applies in all federal jurisdictions; except states, tribes, and territories that EPA has approved to administer their own RRP programs.  According to the article those states are, Wisconsin, Iowa, North Carolina, Mississippi, Kansas, Rhode Island, Utah, Oregon, Massachusetts, and Alabama have had their programs approved in lieu of the Federal program. Approved State programs must be at least as strict as the EPA regulations.
Don't forget tomorrow is the EPA Information Session at Hofstra and if you have any questions please post them here or at Future Environment Designs Forum, and I will try to get an answer to your questions.

Related articles

• Hofstra is Hosting an Information Session on EPA's Lead RRP Law. (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Massachusetts DOS and EPA Begins Enforcement of Lead RRP (unitedallianceservices.typepad.com)
• EPA's Local Coordinator for the Lead Paint Rule at Hofstra University (futureenv.blogspot.com)

Hofstra is Hosting an Information Session on EPA's Lead RRP Law.

Image via WikipediaThe Guest Speaker will be Jeanette Dadusc, the RRP Coordinator, Region 2 for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  I will be attending this free information session on Friday, April 1, 2011 at 11:30 AM at Breslin Hall.  If anyone has any questions they wish me to ask, please post them here or on the Future Environment Designs Forum.  Maybe I will see you there.

Related articles

• EPA's Local Coordinator for the Lead Paint Rule at Hofstra University (futureenv.blogspot.com)
• Massachusetts DOS and EPA Begins Enforcement of Lead RRP (unitedallianceservices.typepad.com)
• Attention Homeowners/Realtors: EPA RRP Certification required to All Contractors & Workers If Your Home Has Been Built Prior 1978 (briarhillsinfo.wordpress.com)